Blog

Fenlex assists with sailing yacht Perseverance I acquisition

We are proud to have played a part in the process to acquire, build and deliver to client a brand new custom built Baltic 117 (35.8m) sailing yacht, Perseverance I. The yacht is designed by Dykstra Naval Architects who have described the yacht as “a pilot cutter with timeless elegance”. The interiors, designed by deVosdeVriesDesign, are described as ‘light and contemporary’ interior using stained oak, dark bog oak trims and ‘industrial chic hardware’. The yacht is loaded with the latest technology available with electric diesel engines for silent cruising and smart cabins to minimise and recycle energy used. The yacht will cater for 8 guests and 6 crew.

The yacht shall be registered by our colleagues at Fenech and Fenech Marine Services under the Malta Flag and is expected to arrive in Malta in the latter half of September. Sea trails and testing have shown her to not only be extremely comfortable but an exceptionally fast yacht as well. The yacht will be available for charter after delivery.

#wearefenlex

Fenlex Corporate Services at Industry Talks by ASCS

Claire Scicluna – Director/Head of Compliance and Banking, Nadine Farrugia our Assistant Head of Accounts and William Cassar our Head of Tax Compliance recently participated in an Industry talk organised by ASCS whereby our team shared their personal experience within Fenlex and how the majors they selected complemented their roles today. The talk was intended to give students a practical idea of how their careers could develop after university.

The Responsibilities of iGaming Operators towards their Players

Author: Christian Farrugia, Senior Corporate Administrator

Date: 19 May 2021

In the local remote gaming sector, there is a somewhat common misconception that operators are at liberty to capitalize on their players’ inability to stop playing without any concern for their wellbeing, especially on those who are considered vulnerable. While gambling addiction and its consequences are very real, the idea that companies can blindly make the most out of their misfortunes is far from the truth. Today, we take a look at what measures are currently in place for this heavily regulated and monitored industry.

Player Protection Regulations and Directives

The Gaming Player Protection Regulations and the Player Protection Directive were both issued in 2018 as part of the overhaul of local gaming laws. Together (but not exclusively), they provide an overview of obligations imposed on locally licenced operators for the protection of those who register and place bets on their websites.

Before an operator can obtain a licence, it must first have in place several written policies and procedures that address their players, including advertising policies, how player funds are managed and how player complaints are handled. Subsequent (i.e. after a licence to operate is issued) audits are coordinated by the regulator to ensure that the operator has in fact implemented, maintained and updated the contents of its written policies and procedures, and continues to do so on an ongoing basis.

The terms and conditions, which form part of the pack of obligatory documents that the operator must retain, are to always be easily accessible and intelligible on the website. New registrants must accept them as part of their registration process and any changes must be communicated to players and accepted once more before they can continue playing. Game rules must also always be readily available on the company’s website.

Segregation of Players’ Funds

Players’ funds must always be kept segregated from the company’s own funds, in a separate ring-fenced player’s account. These monies cannot be attacked by the company’s creditors, and the financial institution with which the account is held must provide a written declaration confirming that it will not enforce or execute any claim against the players’ account and it will not combine it with any other accounts in respect of any debt owed to it by the company.

Players will always have a right to their available balances, which must always be clearly shown on the operator’s website, in the specified currency. Operators are also obliged to submit periodic reports to the regulator to show that, in the hypothetical scenario where all registered players were to withdraw all their balances at once, the operator would have the sufficient liquidity to comply with said requests. Any shortfalls must be made good for by the company through its own operating fund.

Player Complaints and Player Support

Operators must have a mechanism in place to handle and discuss player complaints in a timely manner. Players are also given the option to put forward their complaints with the regulator directly. In such instances, the regulator’s own player support unit would get in touch with the operator to have the matter addressed within a specified deadline. Said unit also has the right to escalate serious breaches to the authority’s compliance sector for further action.

Furthermore, operators must offer players the possibility to refer a dispute to an approved Alternative Dispute Resolution entity if the player does not feel satisfied with the conduct of the operator following the initial complaint. Contact details of the ADR entity should be made clear.

Problem Gambling

The company should also have the ability to detect potential problem gambling by training its staff to spot unsustainable or erratic gameplay and take the necessary actions to get in touch with the player and, if need be, suspend further play. Links to problem gambling and support websites should always be available on the website and players should also have access to means to help them determine whether they have a gambling problem or not.

Other obligatory features on the website include the ability to self-impose certain limits, on for example the amount of time one can play, the amount of bets one can place or the maximum amount of losses a player can incur, within a specific period of time. If a player decides to increase a limit to continue playing, said increase will only come into effect after a “cooling-off” period, which allows the individual to mentally break away from a potentially damaging momentum of continuous betting. A decrease in limits (therefore reducing exposure) should take immediate effect.

Players should be able to opt for a “reality check”, which is when the website provides periodic pop-ups to remind the client of how long he has been continuously playing, how much has been wagered and won/lost. The payer would need to manually close this pop-up as a way of acknowledging the content. Full-screen games must always display a real-time clock.

Another feature is self-exclusion, where a player who is feeling vulnerable can opt to exclude himself from playing any further, temporarily or permanently. During this period, the website would allow the player to log in and view general information and gameplay history but cannot accept any further bets. Furthermore, no marketing material can be distributed to the player during this time. This also applies to companies with more than one brand; if the player excludes himself via one brand, it becomes effective across the board.

The above is by no means an exhaustive list of measures one must take to protect players’ welfare but provides an indication of the extent that this is integrated into the day-to-day management of any licenced gaming operation.

Should you require any further information or assistance on the matter, please do not hesitate to reach out to us personally on info@fenlex.com.

 

©Fenlex Corporate Services Ltd.

Disclaimer │ The information provided on this Update does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. All information, content, and materials available are for general informational purposes only.  This Update may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information and you are advised to seek updated advice.

Naomi Barry elected to Executive Committee of Employment Agencies Business Section

Fenlex are proud to announce that Naomi Barry, Human Resources Manager, has been elected to the Executive Committee of the new Employment Agencies business section within The Malta Chamber of Commerce.

The new section aims at strengthening the voice of employment agencies by addressing regulatory matters, specifically those related to Government agencies.

The New Separate Tax Computation for Married Individuals

Authors: Stephanie Aquilina Galea, Tax Supervisor and Sarah Schembri, Tax Accounts Assistant

Date: 26th April 2021

Introduction

Married couples have for several years submitted one income tax return covering the declarations for both individuals.   Traditionally, married couples prepared an annual joint or separate income tax computation, and declared their income in one income tax return which is issued in the name of the responsible spouse.

However, the Income Tax Act was amended and introduced a new tax option to married couples with effect from 2020.

Situation before the 2020 changes

Prior to the 2020 changes, married couples, including civil partners, were able to opt for a separate computation.  This was usually preferable in instances whereby both individuals were earning employment, trading, or pension income.  Any income that was not employment income (excluding directors’ fees), trading income or pension income, in other words, ‘earned’ income, was automatically taxable under the higher income earning spouse.  This would in practice result in this other income being potentially taxed at higher tax rates.  Moreover, any tax credits were received under the responsible spouse’s name by default, even if they would have pertained to the other spouse.

What are the changes?

As from calendar year 2020, married couples, including civil partners, that live together have the option to receive a separate income tax return under their name, being referred to as ‘separate return election’, as long as the married couple are:

  • Employed (excluding directors’ fees), deriving trading income, or pension income; or
  • Have agreed to a separation of assets upon marriage

The separate return election means that the income of each spouse will be charged to tax under their own name separately from the income of the other spouse.  This includes any other income, whereby such other income may now be brought to charge in the name of the spouse actually receiving said income as opposed to it being brought to charge in the name of the spouse with the higher income.  Likewise, any tax credits or deductions shall be allocated to the spouse actually deriving or incurring such credit or deduction respectively.  With respect to deductions, the law makes reference to the name included on the receipt as an indication of the recipient.  If the receipt is issued in the name of both spouses, the deduction is to be split equally between the spouses. The same applies for any unabsorbed tax losses or capital allowances, and any unabsorbed tax credits.

Practical Implications

Married couples that satisfy the above-mentioned conditions may request a separate tax return from the Commissioner for Revenue.   The election will come into effect on 1 January of the year immediately following that in which the election is made and shall continue to have effect until such election is revoked. Spouses who do not opt for a separate return can still apply to receive a tax refund directly in their bank account rather than receiving a cheque under the name of the responsible spouse.

As stated in the paragraph above, the married couple may revoke the separate return election by signing a notice and sending it to the Commissioner for Revenue. The election will cease to have effect as from the year of assessment starting from 1 January of the year immediately following the notice of revocation and will be available for election again after 5 years.

Under any option, the tax return together with a self-assessment must be submitted by the end of June of the year following the calendar year.  Penalties will be incurred unless the tax return is submitted by the said deadline. It is up to the Commissioner for Revenue to decide whether the individuals are required to file a tax return or not. If the new election is selected, each spouse will be responsible to submit their own returns based on their Income in accordance with the Income Tax Act.

Concluding Remarks

Apart from allowing for a fairer calculation of the tax charge for married individuals, one may also conclude that this new law promotes equality between the spouses, an aspect which was the previous system did not take into consideration.  As the National Commission for the Promotion of Equality argued, in order for this reform to be as effective as possible, the separate tax return should be automatic rather than an option ‘since equal treatment should be the default and applicable to all’.

 

For further information and assistance, please contact us:

Sarah Schembri – Tax Accounts Assistant

sarah.schembri@fenlex.com

+356 25 990 693

 

 

Directors’ Fees – Tax and VAT Implications

Authors: Stephanie Aquilina Galea – Tax supervisor, Jade Micallef – Senior Tax Accountant, Maria Spiteri Purkiss – Tax Accountant

Date: 12th April 2021

Director Fees – Tax and VAT Implications

Have you ever considered the income tax and VAT treatment of a director and more so, whether such treatment differs between Maltese tax residents or otherwise? The objective of this article is to highlight the salient features relative to the income tax and VAT considerations in respect of directors’ fees.

Income Tax Considerations relating to Directors’ fees

By virtue of Article 4(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act (ITA) tax is chargeable on income in respect of “gains or profits from any employment or office including the value of any benefit provided by reason of any employment or office”. Gains or profits which are taxed in terms of the said article include, inter alia, director’s fees.

For Maltese income tax purposes, director’s fees are arise in the country where the services rendered to the company in question is managed and controlled. This means that directors’ fees derived by a person for services provided to a company which is managed and controlled in Malta are said to be arising in Malta.   Therefore, such fees are taxable in Malta regardless of where such director is resident for tax purposes.

The approach of the Maltese Tax Authorities is the same  position adopted by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Model Tax Convention (‘OECD MTC’) whereby Article 16 thereof prescribes that “Directors’ fees and other similar payments derived by a resident of a Contracting State (say State A) in his capacity as a member of the board of directors of a company which is a resident of the other Contracting State (say State B) may be taxed in that other State (State B).” However, one should note that Contracting States might decide to take a different position adopted by the OECD MTC. Therefore, the binding document between Contracting States is not the OECD MTC but the double taxation agreement in force between the two Contracting States. For example, the Malta-Poland DTA amended recently by virtue of L.N. 64 of 2021 denotes that where Polish tax resident directors sit on the board of a Maltese tax resident company, exclusive taxation is granted to Poland as the resident State of the directors and thus, Malta, does not have the right to tax the director’s fees.

Further, the Commentary to Article 16 of the OECD MTC also clarifies that directors’ fees refer to fees and similar payments received in the capacity of the person acting as a member of the board of directors and does not include emoluments relative to other services provided to the company such as advisory services, employment amongst others.

Director’s fees – practical implications

Director fees payable to an individual director, whether said director is tax resident in Malta or not, for directorship services rendered to a company which is managed and controlled in Malta, will be included as part of that individual’s total emoluments and taxed in accordance with the Final Settlement System (FSS) Rules at the applicable progressive rates of tax.

On the other hand, when a director is a corporate director rather than an individual, director fees will be part of the corporate director’s revenue and will be subject to tax at the Maltese corporate tax rate of 35%.

Nonetheless, a Maltese tax resident individual or corporate director rendering services to a company which is effectively managed and controlled outside Malta should consider their tax implications, if any, in the jurisdiction where the company in question is effectively managed and controlled. In such circumstances, Malta, as the resident state of the director, may still have the right to tax, however, this very much depends on the applicable tax treaty if any, between Malta and the country where the company is managed and controlled.

Non-Maltese tax residents on the other hand are subject to tax in Malta on Malta-sourced income, that is, income arising in Malta subject to the applicable double tax treaty in force.

VAT Considerations relating to Directors’ fees

In terms of article 5 of the VAT Act, the activities of an ’employee’ which, by definition includes the ‘holder of an office’, are not regarded as an economic activity for VAT purposes. In this respect, where an individual is appointed to the post of director of a company, the fees paid by the company to the director by way of remuneration for his/her activities or ‘services’ would typically fall outside the scope of Maltese VAT.

The main principle of VAT is to charge VAT on supplies of goods or services when the supply is made by a taxable person acting as such.  All activities carried out by a non-taxable person falls outside scope for VAT purposes.  The activities of a holder of an office are not considered as an economic activity for VAT purposes and therefore any remuneration received by the latter in consideration of his/her functions fall outside the scope of VAT.

The VAT treatment of supply Directors

There are scenarios whereby the individual holding an office (i.e. the director) is not remunerated directly, and in his/her own name, for the said activities.  These would include:

  • Where a corporate services provider or other service provider makes available, to its client company, an individual to sit on the board of directors of the client company; or
  • Where a director’s remuneration is paid to another company of which the director is a shareholder.

Up until very recently, it was generally considered that fees paid in both of the above mentioned circumstances fall outside scope of Malta VAT.  This, on the basis that the said fees constitute remuneration for an activity which is not to be considered as an economic activity for VAT purposes, that is, ‘holder of an office’.

Further to the CJEU judgement C-94/19 (San Domenico Vetraria SpA vs Agenzia delle Entrate), the above mentioned interpretation has been challenged since the judgement has reaffirmed that the lending or secondment of staff by one company to another (including the services of a director) with fall within the scope of VAT and would thus be taxable.

As a result of the judgement, in practice, when a company charges another company for the provision of an individual to sit on the board of the latter company, the transaction should be treated as an economic activity and therefore falling within scope of VAT and subject to the normal VAT rules.

Corporate Directors

In instances whereby a director of a company is a corporate director (and thus not an individual), one may conclude that the activities carried out by the said corporate director are activities falling within the scope of VAT.  The exclusion relating to the activities of the holder of an office in terms of Article 5 of the VAT Act specifically refers to an ‘individual’, and therefore a corporate director cannot be regarded as an ‘employee’ for the purposes of the said Article 5.

Conclusion

Pursuant to the above insight, we hope that the main aim of this article is now more fulfilled and therefore, all readers particularly directors, have now a better understanding on the income tax and VAT considerations relative to directors’ fees.

For further information and assistance, please contact us:

Maria Spiteri Purkiss – Tax Accountant maria.spiteripurkiss@fenlex.com +356 25 990 647